|
The MBTI is a validated, reliable inventory that assesses a person's
personality type.(54) The MBTI makes the
theories of Carl Jung more accessible to people.(55)
Jung believed that what seemed to be random behavior is actually predictable
based on the differences in how individuals use their perception and judgment.(56)
Questions on the MBTI are designed to classify individuals according to
four basic preferences: (1) extraversion versus introversion; (2) sensing
versus intuitive; (3) thinking versus feeling; and (4) judgment versus
perception.(57)
Extraversion (E) versus introversion (I) are two opposite preferences
used to describe a person's orientation of energy(58)
-- where a person likes to focus his or her attention.(59)
Sensing (S) versus intuitive (N) are opposite preferences that describe
the perceiving function -- the way in which people prefer to acquire information.
They deal with how a person goes about finding out about the world around
them.(60) Thinking (T) and feeling (F)
are the judging function. These opposite preferences reflect the different
means that individuals use to reach conclusions, make decisions, form opinions,
and arrive at judgments.(61) Judgment (J)
and perception (P) describe a person's orientation to outer life -- the
way a person deals with the outer world. Each of the four preference types
represent a habitual choice between rival alternatives. A person's preferences
affect not only what they perceive, but how they draw conclusions about
what they perceive.(62)
There are several uses of "learning styles" as determined by the MBTI.
(63)For instance, the MBTI has been used
to predict and develop the different teaching methods and environments
best suited to each type.(64) The MBTI
can be used to predict the preferred patterns of mental functioning, such
as information processing, idea development, and judgment formation.(65)
The MBTI can be used to foretell patterns of attitudes and interests that
influence an individual's learning situation(66)
and to predict a person's disposition to pursue certain learning circumstances
and avoid others.(67)
In addition, the MBTI can be used to predict a person's nature to use
"certain learning tools and to avoid others."(68)
While the MBTI has been used to predict academic performance,(69)
it cannot effectively foretell a student's actual study behavior.(70)
Consequently, it cannot be used effectively as either an admission tool
or an ultimate tool for predicting the success of particular students. |
|
54. FN54. Marcin, supra note 17, at 105 (discussing
the ancient history of type theory including astrology).
55. FN55. See generally Don Peters, Forever Jung:
Psychological Type Theory, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Learning
Negotiation, 42 Drake L. Rev. 1, nn.42-90 (1993); Marcin, supra note 17,
at 103-105. See also Carl G. Jung, Psychological Types (1921) reprinted
in 6 The Collected Works of C. G. Jung (William McGuire et al. eds. &
R.C.F. Hull trans., 1971).
56. FN56. See generally Mary H. McCaulley, Jung's
Theory of Psychological Types and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Advances
in Personality Assessment (Paul M. Reynolds ed. 1981); Marcin, supra note
17.
57. FN57. Isabel Briggs Myers & Mary H. McCaulley,
Manual: A Guide to The Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
1 (1985).
58. FN58. Isabel Briggs Myers, Introduction to Type:
A Description of the Theory & Application of the Myers-Briggs Type
Indicator 5 (Allen L. Hammer ed., 4th ed. 1987).
59. FN59. Marie-Louise Von Franz & James Hillman,
Lectures on Jung's Typology 160 (1971); Daryl Sharp, Personality Types:
Jung's Model of Typology (1987).
60. FN60. Myers & McCaulley, supra note 57,
at 5.
61. FN61. Id. at 6.
62. FN62. Myers & McCaulley, supra note 57,
at 2.
63. FN63. See generally Jensen, supra note 51, at
182; Lawrence, supra note 50, at 15; Gordon D. Lawrence, People Types and
Tiger Stripes: A Practical Guide to Learning Styles (1982); Mary H. McCaulley
& Frank L. Natter, Psychological (Myers-Briggs) Type Differences in
Education (1974).
64. FN64. Jensen, supra note 51, at 181-83.
65. FN65. Id. at 182.
66. FN66. Id.
67. FN67. Id. at 183
68. FN68. Id.
69. FN69. See generally Leiden, supra note 18, at
395-401; Janice A. Nisbet et al., Predictors of Academic Success with High
Risk College Students, 23 J.C. Student Personnel 227-35 (1982); John G.
Bruhn, et al., Predictors of Academic Performance Among Physician Assistants,
8 The P.A. Journal 181-87 (1978). In fact, the MBTI has been widely used
in examining teaching, learning and academic aptitudes. Lawrence, supra
note 50, at 2.
70. FN70. Jensen, supra note 51, at 183. Many different
factors influence a student's actual behavior, including personality type,
parental influence, instruction, learning environment, and maturity. Id.
Consequently, a "perfect correlation between personality type and learning
style is not possible." Id. |